Trials performed by the curly hair transplant surgeon Dr Seager in 1996 gave significant credence to the operative technique of unit follicular hair transplant. Since these experiments had demonstrated that the survival rate of intact follicular unit was better than the only hair micro-grafts, the use of micro-grafts for locks transplant surgery was more or less dropped.
Though the results of surgery hair restoration with the use of follicular device transplants were properly pleasantly pleasing, this form of hair transplant surgery experienced from problem with necessitating a long time period (6-8 hr) to complete a transplant session. That involved teams of highly skilled assistants for the hair transplant procedure of separating the follicular devices. As the procedure required while and much skill the procedure was showing to be very expensive to the patient. The operative damage caused to the follicle when two follicular units extremely close along were dissected apart, also begun to affect the results of Hair Restoration Surgical treatment. Hair Restoration Network
A reduced success in follicular unit transplantation was more frequent in frizzy hair restoration surgeries that have been being performed by hair implant surgeons undertaking follicular device transplant surgery only occasionally. The fact was a vast amount of matter to the professional locks transplant surgeon. The principal reason for a reduced success rate is that the assistants of the mind of hair transplantation doctor lacked the expertise and experience in effectively separating single follicular units and dissecting them at a fast pace.
Making sure the follicular unit remains in one piece and is dissected and implanted into the crown in the shortest possible is essential for increasing the chances of the hair follicles surviving the process and growing. Yet whenever an assistant was not able to care for this important aspect, it damaged the results.
Pertaining to the above mentioned reasons, a technique that leaves the follicular unit unchanged but at the same time advocates the use of three and four-haired follicular groupings for medical hair restoration was advanced by the progressive locks transplant surgeons. This treatment was found to have many advantages over follicular unit transplantation.
Just one locks follicular unit would not automatically comprise a single curly hair and may contain 2-4 hairs in an one hole. When the follicular units are found very near the other person in the donor skin sample it is not a good idea to separate them as it can cause iatrogenic harm to them. Good thing about this fact is taken to form three-and four-haired groups when 2 two-haired follicular units or a 3 haired unit and one-haired unit are naturally located very near each other. A group (of 1-4 follicular units naturally located near each other) transplanted as a single graft leads to superior hair expansion and at the same time lessens the operative damage and trauma to the recipient site.